Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

    • Lawscot Tech

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Equality and diversity

Journal logo
  • PRACTICE

    PRACTICE

    • Practice

    • Corporate law

    • Criminal law

    • Employment law

    • Environment law

    • Family law

    • Industry updates

    • Intellectual property

    • Property law

    • Technology law

    • Technology and innovation

    • Practice

    • Corporate law

    • Criminal law

    • Employment law

    • Environment law

    • Family law

    • Industry updates

    • Intellectual property

    • Property law

    • Technology law

    • Technology and innovation

  • PEOPLE

    PEOPLE

    • People

    • Equality, diversity & inclusion

    • Ethics & professional responsibility

    • Obituaries

    • Wellbeing & support

    • Noticeboard

    • From the President's desk

    • People

    • Equality, diversity & inclusion

    • Ethics & professional responsibility

    • Obituaries

    • Wellbeing & support

    • Noticeboard

    • From the President's desk

  • CAREERS

    CAREERS

    • Careers

    • Job board

    • Leadership

    • Management

    • Skills

    • Training & education

    • Careers

    • Job board

    • Leadership

    • Management

    • Skills

    • Training & education

  • KNOWLEDGE BANK

    KNOWLEDGE BANK

    • Knowledge Bank

    • Book club

    • Interviews

    • Sponsored content

    • Next Generation of Scottish Legal Talent

    • The Future of Law on our High Streets

    • Behind the Scenes with Scotland’s In-House Legal Professionals

    • Knowledge Bank

    • Book club

    • Interviews

    • Sponsored content

    • Next Generation of Scottish Legal Talent

    • The Future of Law on our High Streets

    • Behind the Scenes with Scotland’s In-House Legal Professionals

  • ABOUT THE JOURNAL

    ABOUT THE JOURNAL

    • About the Journal

    • Journal contacts

    • Journal Editorial Advisory Board

    • Newsletter sign-up

    • About the Journal

    • Journal contacts

    • Journal Editorial Advisory Board

    • Newsletter sign-up

Solicitor's failures to comply 'undermine the status of the profession', says Court of Session

29th October 2025 Written by: Scottish Legal Complaints Commission

A solicitor’s failure to comply with regulators and court orders “undermines the status of the profession” according to the Court of Session.

At a hearing this week (Case Reference: COS/P687/25) the court stopped short of finding a solicitor in contempt of court for failure to comply with a court order to deliver files to the SLCC, one of several cases of non-compliance petitioned to the court regarding this solicitor.  

However, the solicitor was ordered to pay expenses at the higher rate, and the court described the decision as a “a shot across the bow”.

Counsel for the solicitor outlined professional and personal circumstances which had led to the solicitor “drowning under the weight of ordinary business and dealing with complaints”. However, he noted that despite the defences provided, “these are not obligations that can be avoided”.

Counsel also noted that “regulators are generally sympathetic, but one has to engage” and that non-compliance with a court order cannot be excused “because it should never get to that stage”.

Commenting on the proceedings, Chief Executive, Neil Stevenson, said, “We have now seen a number of cases where solicitors have not complied with our requests, or with court orders, and evidence has been led in court showing they were unable to deal with ordinary business, including responding to complaints from clients.

“While we have sympathy with people’s personal circumstances, it is deeply concerning that regulated professionals who find themselves in difficulties are not seeking the help and support they need to manage their business and to meet the needs of their clients.

“We have seen too many cases where solicitors are clearly unwilling or unable to meet their professional obligations but continue to take on new work while avoiding their existing commitments.

“That’s not in the best interest of their clients, it’s not in the public interest, and it’s not in the interests of the wider profession.”

SPONSORED: The money laundering threat is closer to home than you think

8th December 2025
Anti-money laundering (AML) expert Graham MacKenzie from Amiqus explains why law firms must remain vigilant when applying a risk-based approach to avoid involvement with illicit businesses.

SSDT announces important change in standard of proof applied to professional misconduct

8th December 2025
The Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal has announced a shift in the standard of proof applied in professional misconduct cases.

SSDT Decision: Jade Dupont

4th December 2025
A Complaint was lodged by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Jade Dupont, Solicitor, Glasgow.
About the author
Add To Favorites

Additional

https://www.evelyn.com/people/keith-burdon/
https://lawware.co.uk
https://www.lawscotjobs.co.uk/client/frasia-wright-associates-92.htm
https://www.findersinternational.co.uk/our-services/private-client/?utm_campaign=Scotland-Law-society-Journal-online&utm_medium=MPU&utm_source=The-Journal
https://yourcashier.co.uk/

Related Articles

SPONSORED: The money laundering threat is closer to home than you think

8th December 2025
Anti-money laundering (AML) expert Graham MacKenzie from Amiqus explains why law firms must remain vigilant when applying a risk-based approach...

SSDT announces important change in standard of proof applied to professional misconduct

8th December 2025
The Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal has announced a shift in the standard of proof applied in professional misconduct cases.

SSDT Decision: Jade Dupont

4th December 2025
A Complaint was lodged by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Jade Dupont, Solicitor, Glasgow.

Journal issues archive

Find all previous editions of the Journal here.

Issues about Journal issues archive
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited