Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

Journal logo
  • PRACTICE

    PRACTICE

    • Practice

    • Corporate law

    • Criminal law

    • Employment law

    • Environment law

    • Family law

    • Industry updates

    • Intellectual property

    • Property law

    • Technology law

    • Technology and innovation

    • Practice

    • Corporate law

    • Criminal law

    • Employment law

    • Environment law

    • Family law

    • Industry updates

    • Intellectual property

    • Property law

    • Technology law

    • Technology and innovation

  • PEOPLE

    PEOPLE

    • People

    • Equality, diversity & inclusion

    • Ethics & professional responsibility

    • Obituaries

    • Wellbeing & support

    • Noticeboard

    • People

    • Equality, diversity & inclusion

    • Ethics & professional responsibility

    • Obituaries

    • Wellbeing & support

    • Noticeboard

  • CAREERS

    CAREERS

    • Careers

    • Job board

    • Leadership

    • Management

    • Skills

    • Training & education

    • Careers

    • Job board

    • Leadership

    • Management

    • Skills

    • Training & education

  • KNOWLEDGE BANK

    KNOWLEDGE BANK

    • Knowledge Bank

    • Book club

    • Interviews

    • Sponsored content

    • Knowledge Bank

    • Book club

    • Interviews

    • Sponsored content

  • ABOUT THE JOURNAL

    ABOUT THE JOURNAL

    • About the Journal

    • Contact us

    • Journal Editorial Advisory Board

    • Newsletter sign-up

    • About the Journal

    • Contact us

    • Journal Editorial Advisory Board

    • Newsletter sign-up

Virtual reality and AI in Scottish healthcare

13th December 2024

Artificial intelligence and virtual reality might be carving out a place for themselves in Scottish healthcare, but they bring their own challenges. From ethics to accuracy, there’s much to consider…

The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR) technologies is reshaping industries worldwide, with healthcare being no exception. AI is progressing by the day and demonstrating that it can do many of the same things we can – often more quickly, accurately (sometimes) and cost-effectively.

The global pandemic brought healthcare workforce shortages to the fore and while resources are becoming increasingly stretched, these technological innovations offer tremendous potential for transforming the delivery of healthcare, relieving the pressures on health professionals – and, in turn, health boards. However, they bring with them several unique medicolegal challenges.

Supporting role

AI and VR are emerging as valuable tools across various areas of healthcare, from training and therapy to diagnostics, patient care and administrative tasks. These technologies are helping to streamline operations, allowing healthcare professionals to focus more on clinical practice, thereby increasing efficiency.

AI algorithms are being developed to analyse medical images, aiding in the detection and diagnosis of abnormalities; however, their accuracy has varied and, as such, these processes are having to be utilised with caution. (In fact, how much these systems are being put to use in practice is unclear, and there does not currently appear to be huge reliance on them in day-to-day diagnostic decision-making). In addition, predictive analytics can assist in understanding the effects of policy changes on healthcare systems, as well as providing data on the likelihood of particular patients developing specific conditions.

VR is also gaining recognition in medical education, offering immersive and interactive training simulations that allow medical students and healthcare workers to practice procedures safely and in a risk-free environment. Furthermore, VR-based therapies have shown promise in treating certain mental health conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and phobias.

Responsibility and standards

Despite the exciting potential of these technologies, there are a number of concerns from a medicolegal perspective. One of the primary issues involves accountability and liability, especially in the case of diagnoses or treatment plans influenced by AI. While it’s unlikely that AI will ever replace clinicians entirely in the diagnosis of patients or the formulation of treatment plans, it raises the question of who is ultimately responsible when both AI and human input are involved in decision-making.

The use of AI in healthcare also raises questions about the standard of care. In Scotland, the test for negligence hinges on whether a clinician meets the standard expected of an ordinarily competent clinician in similar circumstances (in terms of the legal test for professional negligence as set out in the case of Hunter v Hanley). How would this apply to an AI system? Given the potential for technical glitches, it’s unlikely that an AI-driven diagnosis would be infallible.

In most cases, the treating clinician will likely bear the ultimate responsibility, regardless of whether or not AI or VR was involved in the diagnosis or treatment process. This means it’s essential that safeguards be put in place in order to protect both patients and healthcare professionals.

Patient privacy and protection

Another significant issue with the use of AI is its interaction with patient data. Healthcare providers must ensure robust security measures are in place to protect private patient information from unauthorised access, in compliance with data protection laws.

Informed consent is also a matter requiring consideration when introducing AI and VR into medical practice. Clinicians will need to ensure that patients fully understand the nature of these technologies, including their risks and potential benefits, before agreeing to their use.

Multidisciplinary collaboration

To ensure responsible and safe implementation, clear guidelines and standards are necessary to regulate the use of AI and VR in healthcare. Collaboration between healthcare regulators, technology developers and legal experts will be crucial in navigating these developments and addressing the medicolegal implications.

While these technologies offer exciting possibilities for innovation and improving healthcare efficiency in Scotland, addressing the associated medicolegal concerns is vital for safeguarding patient safety, privacy and ethical practices.

Written by Carolyn McPhee, Senior Associate at Balfour+Manson LLP

About the author
Add To Favorites

Additional

https://www.clio.com/uk/?utm_medium=bar_partner&utm_source=law-society-scotland&utm_campaign=law-society-scotland-q2
https://www.evelyn.com/people/keith-burdon/
https://lawware.co.uk
https://www.findersinternational.co.uk/our-services/private-client/?utm_campaign=Scotland-Law-society-Journal-online&utm_medium=MPU&utm_source=The-Journal
https://yourcashier.co.uk/
https://www.lawscotjobs.co.uk/client/frasia-wright-associates-92.htm

Related Articles

The importance of understanding domestic abuse, trauma and the law when advising clients

8th May 2025
A sound understanding of the law around and signs of domestic abuse and coercive control is essential not just for...

Urgent call for volunteers — have your say on civil online Case Tracker

5th May 2025
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service has issued an urgent call for volunteers to help bolster their online civil Case...

'Communication with victim key' in new process for dealing with child sexual offenders

1st May 2025
The Lord Advocate has unveiled new processes for handling future rape cases where the accused is a child.

Journal issues archive

Find all previous editions of the Journal here.

Issues about Journal issues archive
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited