Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. June 2010
  6. Action on Gill review

Action on Gill review

Letters from the Lord President and Cabinet Secretary for Justice responding to the President's call for action
14th June 2010 | Lord Hamilton, Kenny MacAskill

From the Cabinet, Secretary for Justice

I read with interest your recent comments in the Journal of the Law Society of Scotland and readily acknowledge and agree that Lord Gill’s Review of the Scottish Civil Courts should be implemented without delay, at least insofar as those aspects which do not require primary legislation and which may be effected by administrative action.

A formal response from the Government to the recommendations of Lord Gill’s Review will issue later this year, but many of the interlocking recommendations will require primary legislation.

Although there is no time to introduce a Civil Courts Reform Bill in the current legislative programme, the Government and the court have already undertaken a range of action in prompt response to the recommendations. These consensual actions have been taken in advance of issuing a formal response, and without identification of a dedicated legislative vehicle. They include the adoption or the active consideration of relevant recommendations on McKenzie Friends, safeguarders, protective costs orders and class actions under the various provisions of the Legal Services and Children’s Hearings Bills and proposed revisions to the rules of court.

Other recommendations which have significant cost implications remain under consideration. Clearly, constraints on Government spending both now and for the foreseeable future will impact significantly on these recommendations. I have, however, instructed officials to consider the options for conducting a review of the cost and funding of litigation which, as Lord Gill noted, is a necessary part of the information required to underpin design of the recommended reforms. Implementation will need to be agreed, principally with the Lord President, the Court of Session and the judicially led Scottish Courts Service; it also needs to be carefully and jointly managed.

I note your comment that “consensus surrounds much of the Gill reforms”. You are no doubt aware of the response from the Faculty of Advocates, which expresses concern about the structural changes proposed to the court hierarchy. The Faculty’s response can be accessed at: www.advocates.org.uk/news/news_ 20100120.html . These are not the only concerns expressed, and all will require proper consideration.

I am copying this letter to the Editor of the Journal of the Law Society with a view to its publication in the Journal.

Kenny MacAskill MSP, Cabinet Secretary for Justice

Send your letters to: Email: journal@connectcommunications.co.uk or by post to:

The Editor, The Journal, Studio 2001, Mile End, Paisley PA1 1JS f: 0141 561 0400

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

In this issue

  • Embrace "the new lawyer", mediation expert will tell conference
  • Best practice governance for family businesses: a new dawn
  • Spanning the divide
  • Action on Gill review
  • A House divided?
  • Get it right first time
  • Views from the front line
  • Push for change
  • "If ABSs are the answer, what's the question?"
  • Common cause
  • Shaping a new life
  • Essential artl
  • Smart bows out at AGM
  • It's the final countdown
  • Law reform update
  • Ask Ash
  • Here comes the rain again...
  • True or false?
  • Journey's end
  • Win some, lose some
  • Forget getting paid!
  • Thumbs up for Google?
  • A sporting result?
  • Buying into good causes
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
  • Website review
  • Book reviews

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited