Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. February 2013
  6. Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Report relating to Roy William Andrew Miller
18th February 2013

Roy William Andrew Miller

A complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Roy William Andrew Miller, solicitor, Glasgow. The Tribunal found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct in respect of his failure to return a payslip, a HMRC tax credit review statement and a payment of £200 when requested to do so by his client; his failure or delay in responding to correspondence and statutory notices from the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission and the Society; and his failure or delay in responding to court proceedings against him by the Society in the Court of Session, failure to obtemper an order of the court and his being found guilty of contempt.

The Tribunal censured the respondent and fined him in the sum of £250.

The Tribunal noted that the respondent’s conduct in this case related to one transaction. However the respondent failed to communicate effectively with his client and with the Commission, the Society and also the court. Failure on the part of solicitors to comply with the Commission, the Society and the courts is prejudicial to the reputation of the legal profession. The Tribunal found it bizarre that the respondent let matters get as far as the Court of Session, resulting in the finding of contempt. In the circumstances the Tribunal was satisfied that the respondent’s conduct was serious and reprehensible enough to amount to professional misconduct. The Tribunal noted the respondent’s previously unblemished record and the heavy price he had already paid for his conduct, and did not consider that the public would be at risk if he was allowed to continue in private practice unsupervised. The Tribunal felt that a censure plus a fine of £250 would be sufficient penalty.

www.ssdt.org.uk
Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

In this issue

  • Know your protection
  • The Journal Annual Index 2012
  • Rights around corroboration
  • Cadder and common law fairness
  • Age-old questions
  • Master your mail
  • Reading for pleasure
  • A simple guide to arbitration for non-contentious lawyers
  • Opinion column: Tim Haddow
  • Book reviews
  • Profile
  • President's column
  • Legal aid: another look
  • Early warning system...
  • Holding back the state
  • It's all about cash...
  • Charges changing
  • Keep CALM and carry on
  • Getting in quick
  • Views of children
  • More change. Less law?
  • Forward, though I canna see...
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
  • Bankers: a breed apart?
  • Ruaig an Fhèidh: 3
  • The other alternative
  • Risk refresher
  • Ask Ash
  • Law reform roundup
  • Judge's conflict of interest warning
  • How not to win business: a guide for professionals
  • From the Brussels office
  • Sent in error

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited