Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. November 2013
  6. Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Report relating to Alison Baxter
18th November 2013

Alison Baxter

A complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Alison Baxter, solicitor, formerly of Baxter & Co, 18 Victoria Street, Aberdeen and now care of Burness, Paull & Williamsons, Aberdeen. The Tribunal found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct in respect of her failure and delay over a period of eight and a half years to record a standard security in favour of a lender and disposition in favour of her client, and failure to respond to communications from the lender or their agents.

The Tribunal censured the respondent. The Tribunal had a discussion about whether or not the respondent's conduct was sufficiently serious and reprehensible to meet the Sharp test. The incident related to one client and one file.

On balance, however, the Tribunal considered that the respondent's conduct did meet the test of professional misconduct, given that the delay continued for a totally unacceptable period of eight and a half years, during which time the client remained uninfeft and the lender remained unsecured. Extensive delays in recording deeds and failure to respond to lenders in respect of enquiries about these delays are prejudicial to the profession and likely to bring the profession into disrepute.

The respondent did not provide a satisfactory explanation or much detail about why she failed to respond to the lender between 2005 and 2009. It was stated that it was due to health problems, but despite this she managed to continue with her other work. The Tribunal accordingly made a finding of professional misconduct, but considered the respondent's conduct to be very much at the lower end of the scale. The Tribunal noted the respondent's health problems and considered that a censure would be a sufficient penalty in this case.

www.ssdt.org.uk
Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

In this issue

  • Obituary: Professor Ian Willock
  • Competition damages – a rocky road ahead?
  • Heart of the matter
  • Law reform on track
  • Turning back the clock
  • Golf and the right to roam
  • Reading for pleasure
  • Opinion column: Ros McInnes
  • Book reviews
  • Profile
  • President's column
  • Fee review open to views
  • Some more equal than others
  • Balancing act
  • Paving the road to reform
  • Blue sky thinking?
  • A singular status
  • You pay your money
  • Acceptable BYOD use
  • Interesting times still
  • Aliment in vogue again
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
  • Speakers rise creatively to the challenge
  • Why environmental indemnity?
  • SYLA presents...
  • How not to win business: a guide for professionals
  • File reviews - how they can help
  • Ask Ash
  • Making the Act work
  • Law reform roundup
  • From the Brussels office
  • Fraud alert revived
  • "Start the conversation"

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited