Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. June 2014
  6. Ploughing a lone furrow

Ploughing a lone furrow

The Scottish Legal Complaints Commission is working to assist sole practitioners in dealing with complaints
16th June 2014 | David Buchanan-Cook

In 2012, the SLCC commissioned research by TNS-BMRB which, among other things, looked at those complaints which solicitors were resolving themselves – i.e. without the need for a formal referral to the SLCC. The research indicated that on average, approximately half of all complaints were being resolved at this “first tier” stage. 

One key finding of the research was that sole practitioner firms found it significantly more difficult to resolve complaints than larger firms, resolving 45% of their complaints compared with 63% for firms with three partners or more.

At first glance, that seemed understandable. Where a complaint is always going to be about the person complained to, it is difficult for the sole practitioner to take an objective view. In particular, the ability to shirk the natural tendency to take any voiced dissatisfaction as a personal criticism must be difficult. However, rather than try to guess the reasons,  earlier this year we decided to engage with a small sample of sole practitioners to gain a better understanding of their specific challenges in dealing with complaints. The ultimate aim of the exercise was to provide guidance to assist sole practitioners. 

The results 

The vast majority of sole practitioners agreed with our starting premise that it was more difficult for them to deal with complaints than for those working in larger firms.  The majority also highlighted personal involvement with the case as a main barrier for dealing with a complaint, closely followed by lack of peer support and the disproportionate time and resource implications.   

In terms of the methods used to deal with complaints, only one of our sample used more than one method when dealing with a complaint. Half of the sample used an external reviewer to deal with their complaints, usually in a reciprocal arrangement. 

We also asked the group to comment on the extent and usefulness of available training in complaint handling. Again, the majority view was that there was scope for more tailored guidance and training, with approximately a third responding that workshops in this area would be their preferred resource.   

Next steps 

On the basis of this survey, we are currently working with the Law Society of Scotland’s Professional Support team and Connect2Law to design a series of bespoke training modules and workshops. These will be specifically aimed at providing practical guidance for sole practitioners to help prevent the most common types of complaints and promote best practice to handle complaints when they do arise. 

In addition, we will be sharing the detailed findings of our survey, and inviting further dialogue and suggestions, at the Law Society’s forthcoming High Street and Sole Practitioner conference in Dundee, and the Connect2Law annual conference at Gleneagles in October.  

In conclusion, I would like to thank our team of volunteer sole practitioners for their contribution to our work, and congratulate them on their 100% response rate!

The Author

David Buchanan-Cook is Head of Oversight at the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission. Oversight is the area of the SLCC responsible for overseeing how the professional bodies deal with conduct complaints; monitoring and reporting trends in complaints; and producing guidance and best practice notes on complaint handling.
Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

In this issue

  • “It is a wise father...”
  • Let the Games begin
  • Power for change: EHRC's litigation strategy
  • Framework for tribunal reform
  • MIAMs: making meetings the end?
  • Legal locksmiths: locking and unlocking charitable gifts and bequests
  • Reading for pleasure
  • Opinion: Marjory Blair and Kirsty Miguda
  • Profile
  • Book reviews
  • President's column
  • The big day unveiled
  • Identity crisis?
  • Arbitration: the way forward in disputes?
  • A brand new framework
  • Hello? Hello?
  • A mediation story: The Mediator's Log
  • ADR: Faculty makes its pitch
  • Justifying extensions
  • Season of change
  • Beneficial changes
  • Stormy waters
  • Which way will it jump?
  • People on the move
  • Games-time goals
  • Acceptance or warrandice?
  • Getting ready for the "designated day"
  • Turning concern into action
  • Ask Ash
  • Here comes 2012
  • Ploughing a lone furrow
  • Safety in networking
  • Law: an insight job
  • Sheriff decision causes power of attorney alert
  • Law reform roundup
  • "Find a registered paralegal"

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited