Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. October 2014

October 2014

Respect revived
A review of the Court of Appeal decision holding a “Do not resuscitate” notice in conflict with ECHR article 8, and its impact on policy in Scotland.
Adoption: when should contact continue?
Key questions for a psychologist giving expert evidence on post-adoption direct contact
Family values
Judges' awards for the loss of a close relative have increased markedly over the past year or two, with certain factors emerging as of weight
Designs on IP law
A review of the most significant effects of the Intellectual Property Act 2014, which modernises the law regarding designs and patents
Section 29 claims, time bar and service
What constitutes an “application” for a s 29 cohabitant claim? The author reports on a case that fell short
https://lawware.co.uk/

In this issue

  • Respect revived
  • Adoption: when should contact continue?
  • Family values
  • Designs on IP law
  • Section 29 claims, time bar and service
  • Sharing the rewards
  • Reading for pleasure
  • Opinion: Lauren Wood
  • Book reviews
  • Profile
  • President's column
  • Making the big changeover
  • People on the move
  • Another leap forward
  • LBTT: aligning payment and registration
  • The (legal) people have spoken
  • Powers of attorney: another angle
  • Greatness begins with a pin badge
  • Jackson: has it delivered?
  • The test for causing alarm
  • When do licensed premises "cease to be used"?
  • Empowering communities
  • Has clawback lost its tax bite?
  • Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal
  • Property Law Committee Update
  • Call it a comeback
  • Refereeing the referendum
  • Law reform roundup
  • From the Brussels office
  • What's next for SYLA?
  • Mediation first
  • When life begins at 60
  • With growth there is risk? (2)
  • Ask Ash
  • Sustainable future: new ideas for the training contract
  • Mentoring - why?
  • Lender Exchange: what's it about?
  • A bar removed

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited