Drawings and profitability
As all partners know, the key to success of a law firm is managing cash. We need profitability, but above all we need cash. Most partners recognise the importance of prompt billing and trying to get reasonably quick payment. However, one of the tricky areas can relate to drawings and ensuring that partner drawings do not exceed profits – and cash being generated.
In 2014 the Society launched a toolkit to help firms improve their financial stability, and at Journal, February 2014, 34 I described two ratios that banks use to assess a law firm’s financial position, looking at the relationship between a firm’s borrowings and capital. This article describes a third ratio that your bank is likely to calculate and that you should also understand – the “make and take” ratio, which compares drawings with profits.
How do you calculate this?
Simply take the profits available for the partners as shown in the accounts and compare this to total drawings in the accounts: monthly drawings plus payments of income tax.
The illustrations relate to a small firm and a larger firm with £10 million turnover. For each, profits are shown calculated on an accounts basis and also on a cash basis. On the accounts basis, the calculations for both firms appears to indicate all is well – drawings do not exceed the profits being generated.
This is a useful starting point, but “profit” is not the same as cash. Because a firm’s profits are affected by changes in debtors and work in progress, the profits shown in a firm’s accounts may be very different to the cash in the bank.
In the larger firm, the profits shown in the accounts are £3 million. However, part of these profits (£0.5 million) is due to an increase in work in progress. The “cash profit” actually available for the partners to draw is £2.5 million. Debtors have also increased by £0.5 million, so the actual cash generated in the year is just £2 million. The position of the two- partner firm is also bad – profits as shown in the accounts are £132,000; however, £50,000 of this relates to an increase in work in progress and may take months to be translated into cash in the bank. Fortunately there has been no change in opening and closing debtors.
To calculate the “cash” profit, take the profits figure as shown in the accounts and adjust it for any increase/decrease in work in progress. If debtors have changed significantly you should include that movement as well, as that also affects the cash available.
It is very easy for partners to misunderstand the actual cash available for drawings and inadvertently start overdrawing and increasing the firm’s borrowings. If possible, partners should try to keep their drawings within not just the profits as shown by the accounts, but the actual cash being generated by the business.
It can be hard to establish what this might be, but as the financial year progresses it might be possible to predict whether levels of work in progress and debtors are rising or falling and then take action to ensure problems do not arise.
Table 1: "Make and take" ratio, two-partner firm | ||
£ Accounts basis | £ Cash basis | |
Fees | 400,000 | 400,000 |
Opening work in progress /accrued income
|
–100,000 | –100,000 |
Closing work in progress/accrued income
|
150,000 | 150,000 |
Income | 450,000 | 450,000 |
Staff salaries and overheads
|
317,500 | 317,500 |
Net profit per accounts | 132,500 | 132,500 |
Adjust for WIP movement (paper profit)
|
–50,000 | |
Cash profit | 82,500 | |
Change in debtors | – | – |
Cash available | 82,500 | |
Monthly drawings | 79,500 | 79,500 |
Partner income tax | 53,000 | 53,000 |
Total drawings | 132,500 | 132,500 |
"Make and take" ratio | 100% | 161% |
Table 1: "Make and take" ratio, two-partner firm | ||
£ Accounts basis | £ Cash basis | |
Fees | 10,500,000 | 10,500,000 |
Opening work in progress /accrued income
|
–2,000,000 | –2,000,000 |
Closing work in progress/accrued income
|
2,500,000 | 2,500,000 |
Income | 11,000,000 | 11,000,000 |
Staff salaries and overheads
|
8,000,000 | 8,000,000 |
Net profit per accounts | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 |
Adjust for WIP movement (paper profit)
|
–500,000 | |
Cash profit | 2,500,000 | |
Change in debtors | –500,000 | |
Cash available | 2,000,000 | |
Monthly drawings | 1,800,000 | 1,800,000 |
Partner income tax | 1,200,000 | 1,200,000 |
Total drawings | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 |
"Make and take" ratio | 100% | 150% |
Action needed?
Unless the firm has substantial cash balances, or bank agreement has been obtained, drawings should not exceed profits, so this ratio should always be less than 100%. If the firm has to fund any loan repayments, the drawings need to take account of this.
Because the accounts profit takes account of changes in work in progress, the apparent profit might not actually be available to take, so drawings should be constrained to the actual cash likely to be available. This is often a difficult figure to predict, but as a rule of thumb drawings might be restricted to 75% of profits. This also leaves some headroom for funding working capital.
In this issue
- Borrowings, partner capital and profitability
- GDPR and the cloud
- Employment claims: is the flood still to come?
- Contributory fault: drivers, cyclists and pedestrians
- Reading for pleasure
- Opinion: Derek McCabe
- Book reviews
- Profile: Siobhan Kahmann
- President's column
- Application changes coming
- People on the move
- Seeking a better way
- Beyond borders
- Drawings and profitability
- Enforceable rights or progressive policy goals?
- Conflict theory: it works
- What the liquidators don't tell you
- The office on the move
- Please can we have some more?
- Health check for doctors' lines
- When creditors come first
- Keeping goods exclusive
- Tenant Farming Commissioner: the story so far
- HSE appeals: experts allowed in
- Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
- Please don't stop the music
- Broadcasting's business end
- Public policy highlights
- Scam warnings escalate
- This time it's personal
- The game's not a bogey!
- "Only amateurs attack machines; professionals target people"
- When estate agents need client ID
- Banks, client accounts and the Money Laundering Regulations
- Third party rights: what now?
- Ask Ash