Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. March 2021
  6. Data protection: EU transfers flow for a little longer

Data protection: EU transfers flow for a little longer

The EU Commission's Draft Adequacy Decision for the UK secures that smooth data transfers between the EU and the UK will continue – for the time being
15th March 2021 | Laura Irvine

Further to my article in the December 2020 Journal where I set out the difficulties that may arise if the UK left the EU without an adequacy decision, the EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement which was finalised on 24 December 2020 provided us with a bridging mechanism which meant that data transfers from the EU/EEA to the UK could continue without additional safeguards until either (a) an adequacy decision was granted, or (b) for up to six months.

At the same the EU GDPR was retained in UK law and became what is known as the UK GDPR. This has not changed the law in any substantive way, but has changed the way we must refer to it in contracts, agreements and privacy notices etc. 

Draft Adequacy Decision

The latest update is that on 19 February 2021 the EU announced that it had taken the first steps towards the approval of an adequacy decision for the UK in relation to the transfer of personal data under the GDPR, and in relation to the transfer of personal data for law enforcement purposes under the Law Enforcement Directive.

The EU Commission has drafted its decisions, which can be found here, and they will now be considered by the European Data Protection Board and a committee representing the EU member states as part of the comitology procedure. This will hopefully lead to the decisions being adopted, allowing personal data to flow between the EEA countries and the UK without additional safeguards.

It was hoped that as the UK had implemented the GDPR, the EU Commission’s assessment would be a straightforward one, finding that the UK had adequate safeguards in place to provide EU citizens with adequate rights and protections under data protection law. But there were various concerns raised, including the UK state surveillance arrangements which had been criticised by the European Court of Human Rights in October 2020 (see Privacy International v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs C-623-17). Other concerns had been raised about the ability to change data protection law built into the Data Protection Act 2018 and the potential for data subject rights to be weakened.

This is good news for all organisations who rely on data flowing between the UK and EU/EEA: the EU Commission found an essentially equivalent level of protection was available in the UK, paving the way for the adequacy decision. It is hoped that this decision will provide some certainty, in the area of data transfers at least.

Review

The adequacy decisions will be reviewed after four years to ensure that the UK continues to provide essentially equivalent protection. Commitment to the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter is noted by the EU Commission as important to its adequacy decision. Any deviation from that commitment, and any changes that the UK makes to data protection law which weakens protections for data subjects over the next four years, will be taken into account at this review.

There is also still the possibility that the decision will be challenged, as Max Schrems has now done successfully twice in relation to the two partial adequacy decisions relating to transfers to the US. Both Safe Harbour and the Privacy Shield have been struck down by the EU Court of Justice, so the UK must be wary of a challenge from his organisation or similar. It is therefore also to be hoped that this “certainty” is not short lived.

The Author

Laura Irvine, partner, Davidson Chalmers Stewart

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • People on the move: March 2021
  • Book reviews: March 2021
  • Reading for pleasure: March 2021

Perspectives

  • Opinion: David Martyn
  • President's column: March 2021
  • Editorial: March 2021
  • Profile: Nick Taylor
  • Viewpoints: March 2021

Features

  • Climate action: positive steps for progressive lawyers
  • Post-pandemic flexible working: not so remote
  • Singled out: discrimination for living alone
  • Stronger shade of green
  • Child contact and protection from domestic abuse
  • A new welfare test: plus ça change?
  • Conference calls

Briefings

  • Civil court: Nuts and bolts issues
  • Corporate: The limits of reflective loss
  • Intellectual property: rights in employee creations
  • Agriculture: Allowing tenants to leave for value
  • Family: Teaming up to Zoom in on marriage
  • Data protection: EU transfers flow for a little longer
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
  • Property: Access by prescription: challenge of proof
  • In-house: Moving in-house as an NQ

In practice

  • New AML guidance: what you need to know
  • Schools outreach: a virtual revolution
  • The Word of Gold: The joy of cheques
  • Wills and executries: learning the hard way
  • OPG update
  • The Eternal Optimist: No going back
  • Handling police complaints: seeking fitness for purpose
  • Profile: Christine O’Neill QC
  • Ask Ash: Double demands

Online exclusive

  • A pensions decision for all court lawyers
  • Offending tenants and eviction guidance
  • Trading and charitable status: context matters
  • COVID, QOCS and CPAP thoughts

In this issue

  • E-bundling in practice
  • What does the future hold for the legal office?
  • 5 tips to keep you cybersecure in 2021

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited