Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. January 2022
  6. Where lightning strikes twice

Where lightning strikes twice

Experience of representing injured cyclists following road traffic collisions suggests that police and local authorities are failing to act in relation to certain accident blackspots
17th January 2022 | Roz Boynton

As a solicitor representing injured cyclists, it’s hard not to spot patterns in the incidents that affect our clients. While each of the collisions is unique in itself, unfortunately we often see a repeat set of circumstances: a car travelling in the opposite direction, turning right across a cyclist’s path; a car pulling out from a junction to a cyclist’s left; or a car turning left across a cycle lane. These are all common causes of collisions which have caused death and injury to cyclists, that we see again and again.

However, what is more frustrating is when we see repeat incidents of the same circumstances at the exact same location. We are a niche law firm, and while we have increasing numbers of injured cyclists approach us for representation, we cannot say that we represent all of Scotland’s injured cyclists. So, if our anecdotal experience allows us to recognise that there are accident blackspots on Scotland’s roads, why aren’t our public authorities also joining up the dots and taking action?

Some examples

Cycle Law Scotland has represented three clients involved in collisions on Easter Road, Edinburgh, at the junction between St Clair Street and Dalmeny Street. Proper assessment of the junction might reveal that there is work to be done to make it safer. Perhaps changing the “Give way” sign to a “Stop” sign might prevent future collisions and subsequent injuries.

At Mounthooly roundabout in Aberdeen, four clients have been injured when cars entered the roundabout from Causewayend without giving way to those already established on the roundabout. The wide entrance often means that motorised traffic enters the roundabout at speed. Some foliage prior to entrance would perhaps slow traffic on approach and potentially save another cyclist being injured at this location.

At Portobello Junction, Edinburgh, two cyclists were killed on separate occasions when lorry drivers failed to notice them cycling on their nearside and turned left into a slip road. The deaths of Stuart Elliott in March 2019 and Heather Stronach in November 2020 have only recently sparked action from City of Edinburgh Council, implementing a closure of the slip lane in October 2021. This temporary measure should have been implemented far sooner.

Wrong attitudes

There appears to be a degree of shoulder shrugging and acceptance of collisions involving cyclists. A failure to take any action to improve or consider the causes of collisions, reinforces the belief that cycling is a dangerous activity. Indeed, as a keen cyclist, I often feel I am waiting for it to happen to me.

While on an individual basis, collisions can be a result of momentary inadvertence by a road user, on a wider view we need to challenge our attitudes to responding to collisions involving cyclists.

Our local authorities and Police Scotland, in conjunction with the procurator fiscal, are best placed to spot the patterns and take action. Most cycling incidents are reported to Police Scotland with details of the location noted. Even if detailed investigations aren’t undertaken at the time and no prosecution is brought, surely it would be easy for Police Scotland to spot multiple incidents at the same location and report this to the local authority responsible for further consideration as to whether improvements could be made. This type of analysis is highlighted in a module in the recent Scotland’s Road Safety Framework document. It is mentioned in the “post-crash response” section, but the detail at present seems to be focusing mostly on how to attend to individual incidents more quickly, rather than the wider learning.

Although we seek on the one hand to reduce CO2 emissions and encourage active travel, as a nation we don’t yet address one of the main barriers for many to cycling – safety concerns. If we don’t learn from the past – how can we expect to improve the future? A failure to act now not only means we are likely to see further needless injuries and deaths, but we’ll also see more headlines highlighting the dangers of cycling. This, in turn, will negate any efforts to encourage more people to take up cycling and experience the many benefits that come along with it.

The Author

Roz Boynton is an associate solicitor with Cycle Law Scotland

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • People on the move: January 2022
  • Book reviews: January 2022
  • Reading for pleasure: January 2022

Perspectives

  • Opinion: Adam Tomkins
  • President's column: January 2022
  • Profile: Antony McFadyen
  • Editorial: Another year
  • Viewpoints: Success fees – an anomaly

Features

  • Youthful excess: what price?
  • A trauma-informed guideline
  • Thriving in a pandemic
  • Seeking remedies for the abused
  • A chequered race
  • COVID vaccine: in the child's interests?
  • Open government for lawyers
  • COVID and the claimant: reworking future loss
  • Tradecraft tips

Briefings

  • Civil court: Hearing cases in a new way
  • Insolvency: A claim on the administrators?
  • Licensing: The shape of things to come?
  • Planning: Towards 2045 – the NPF4 roadmap
  • Immigration: Is arrival a crime?
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

In practice

  • A message from new CEO Diane McGiffen
  • Towards the equitable workplace
  • Why take the risk?
  • QES: the who and how
  • Missives: when e-signature won’t work
  • Ask Ash: Up against a bully

Online exclusive

  • Uneasy relationship between adjudication and insolvency
  • All is fair in... disciplinary procedures?
  • Exclusionary rule and pre-contract negotiations
  • Where lightning strikes twice

In this issue

  • Spoofing and hacking: how secure is your email account?
  • Market for craft and fine art is alive and well
  • Restrictions and records: auctioneer year of discovery
  • The importance of expertise in adding value at auction

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited