Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. June 2022
  6. Public policy highlights

Public policy highlights: June 2022

Recent work of the Society's policy committees, covering Scottish Mental Health Law Review; advance choices and medical decision-making; Proposed Fly-tipping (Scotland) Bill
20th June 2022

The Society’s policy committees analyse and respond to proposed changes in the law. Key areas from the last few weeks are highlighted below. For more information see the Society’s research and policy web pages. 

Scottish Mental Health Law Review

The Society responded to the Scottish Mental Health Law Review’s consultation, which sought views on proposals for changes to mental health and incapacity legislation. The response highlighted the need for comprehensive reform, designed to meet all needs for support for the exercise of legal capacity and effective enjoyment of all rights “on the same basis as others”, in terms of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (“UNCRPD”).

It welcomed recommendations for a wideranging scheme of support for the exercise of legal capacity, human rights enablement as a new approach to assessment, and for the principle of an autonomous decision-making test, but called for the abolition of “mental disorder” or similar gateway terminology based on diagnostic criteria, in order to achieve compliance with UNCRPD and a human rights approach. It also called for reforms to protect the rights of carers and children and young people, and highlighted the crucial importance of ensuring accountability within relevant areas of law and practice.

A number of priorities were suggested, including a regime to govern deprivations of liberty and the establishment of a unified tribunal to facilitate a “one door” approach under mental health, adults with incapacity and adult support and protection legislation.

Find out more online.

Advance choices and medical decision-making

A Society working group of legal experts, medical practitioners and academics authored a report, with annexed preparatory papers by members of the group, on advance choices, and medical decision-making in intensive care situations. 

Advance choices, also known as advance directives, are instructions given, or wishes made, by capable adults concerning issues that may arise in the event of their incapacity. The paper identifies and addresses all the matters which, it suggests, would require to be covered in legislation to meet current deficiencies in Scots law.

Medical decision-making in intensive care situations includes decisions about refusing or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, a matter that may be covered by advance choices. The paper calls for urgent reform to provide the clarity and certainty at present lacking in Scots law, offering a basic formulation of the doctor-patient relationship, and resulting obligations, responsibilities and potential liabilities in any situation where medical decision-making cannot proceed in accordance with the informed consent of the patient.

Find out more online, and on p 14 of this issue.

Proposed Fly-tipping (Scotland) Bill

The Society’s Environmental Law and Criminal Law committees responded to a consultation from Murdo Fraser MSP on a proposed Fly-tipping (Scotland) Bill.

The response highlighted the need for a multi-faceted approach to fly-tipping, including consideration of matters such as societal attitudes towards litter and fly-tipping, the challenges of disposing of waste particularly on a smaller scale from domestic use and business, and challenges with enforcement, including resourcing. Improved data collection, co-ordination and reporting would assist in understanding the nature and extent of the problem, and targeting actions and resources appropriately.

Regarding proposed duties on those generating waste, including householders, it was noted that careful consideration would be needed to ensure no unintended consequences. Certain duties of care in relation to waste already exist in the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

Concerns were highlighted regarding a proposal to review the requirement for corroboration in relation to fly-tipping, the response suggesting that the challenges around reporting and prosecution should be investigated before systemic change is considered.

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • People on the move: June 2022
  • Book reviews: June 2022
  • Reading for pleasure: June 2022

Perspectives

  • Opinion: Hannah Slater
  • President's column: June 2022
  • Editorial: The big freeze
  • Viewpoints: Lawyers at panels
  • Profile: Rob Marrs

Features

  • The metaverse – a new world for rights
  • Advance choices: time to fill a gap
  • Wills and their ways
  • Getting it right over reform of moveables
  • Sexual harassment: managing the workplace risk
  • An expensive business

Briefings

  • Criminal court: Hunted within the law?
  • Corporate: The Register of Overseas Entities
  • Intellectual property: A new era for the internet
  • Agriculture: Tenant gives notice then pleads for stay
  • Succession: Challenging valuations
  • Sport: FIFA guide boosts women’s football
  • Property: Property lawyers unite!
  • Data protection: Privacy– recent enforcement highlights
  • In-house: From Windrush to Waltham Forest

In practice

  • Public policy highlights: June 2022
  • Next PC fee set at £585
  • Risk: Time is of the essence...
  • Stalled IT projects – and how to avoid them
  • The Eternal Optimist: Sniff the air
  • AML supervision: a new tipping point?
  • Ask Ash: New boss, old favourites

Online exclusive

  • Parental alienation in Scottish child law
  • Unified Patent Court – winners and losers?
  • Third party harassment: the financial services angle
  • Big Buzz about electric transportation
  • Pride and progress

In this issue

  • Importance of will registration + Certainty Will Search
  • Warren Wander: accredited technologist

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited