Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. October 2022
  6. President's column

President

The Society could do more than it already does to speak up for the profession; but it also needs to give you, the members, more chance to set its agenda, and I want to hear about your concerns on my visits
17th October 2022 | Murray Etherington

I recently attended the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce’s President’s Dinner. The guest speaker was Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham. Some of you may have read his comments on independence; but it wasn’t his views on our current constitutional situation that struck a chord with me, although I did think it was brave of him to address the elephant in the room. It was two other elements of his speech that inspired me.

The first was his comment about his role to advocate unapologetically for the people of Greater Manchester. I feel that this is how we as a Society should be thinking when it comes to speaking up for our profession as a whole. I think we do a reasonable job, but of course more could, and should, be said. We need to be more positive about our impact on civic life in Scotland, the immensely powerful impact solicitors have in their local communities, and our cooperation and engagement with our various partners in Government, the court services and with other stakeholders. We have a great story to tell: for example, we have hard evidence of the support we have from the general public as a profession and we should not be shy about shouting this from the rooftops.

Andy also talked at length about being in the Westminster “bubble” and about not understanding the strength of feeling around centralised politics – how Westminster politicians do not fully appreciate how disenfranchised the people of Scotland and the north of England feel. I think there are some similar comparisons for those of us in the Law Society of Scotland “bubble”. It is easier for Council members and committee members to be aware of the work of the Society, to feel informed about our strategy and what support there is for members. However, when you are in the bubble it can be easy to forget that others may not know as much about what we are working on, and that the information received at committee meetings or in Council may not be common knowledge across the whole profession. It is this “bubble” that I want to pop.

Your agenda

Traditionally, it is Council that sets the agenda – telling you what we think is right for you. Now in the regulatory framework that is, of course, correct but from a members’ perspective we need to be engaging more and providing more opportunities for you, our members, to have input into what we do – whether that’s at formal meetings such as our upcoming SGM this month or more informal opportunities to discuss our work.

This is your Society, and we need your help to shape its present and future.

This is why we encouraged a more involved discourse around the Society’s strategic direction earlier this year. We opened that up to a wider group than just Council, and I believe this has helped us to formulate a more inclusive strategy for the next five years. Our new strategy will be launched this month and we are inviting all of our members to join an online session on Thursday, 20 October to present its key aims. There will of course be an opportunity to ask us questions at the meeting about our plans for the future.

The success of our engagement with members on the strategy is the reason I want to continue that discourse throughout my presidential year. This has started with my constituency visits – for most of them you will get the chance to meet our new CEO; you will hear about what the Society has been doing; but it is absolutely crucial that you come along wanting a discussion. I don’t want these visits to be a presentation which ends with tumbleweed at the point of “Any questions?” I want it to be a conversation. I want to hear your issues and your concerns.

I want to know what you think the Society can do to help you, what we do well at the moment, and where we can improve. So this is a call to action to all of you to come along, get involved and, just maybe, we can make a difference!

The Author

Murray Etherington is President of the Law Society of Scotland – President@lawscot.org.uk

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • People on the move: October 2022
  • Book reviews: October 2022
  • Reading for pleasure: October 2022

Perspectives

  • Opinion: James Chalmers
  • President's column: October 2022
  • Editorial: Changed spots?
  • Profile: Lauren Wright
  • Viewpoints: October 2022

Features

  • Five years and growing
  • Immigration appeals: a case apart
  • Short term lets: a new dawn
  • Death by driving: the quest for justice
  • Scottish arbitration: a new era
  • Success: time to reframe
  • Justice: seeking a guiding hand

Briefings

  • Criminal court: Dealing with delay
  • Criminal court: Justiciary Office briefing
  • Licensing: The murky world of insolvency
  • Insolvency: AiB’s powers under review again
  • Tax: A “mini-budget” with big changes
  • Immigration: Scaling up for growth
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
  • Property: New homes codes: setting the record straight
  • Property: In Scots law, what makes a contract a lease?
  • In-house: How to become O shaped

In practice

  • Public policy highlights: October 2022
  • Inclusion: where to begin?
  • New register, new risks
  • Challenge of the written word
  • The Unloved Lawyer: Not quite Boston Legal
  • Ask Ash: Issues over unsolicited help

Online exclusive

  • Solicitors risk Equality Act issues: disability survey
  • An introductory guide to email account security
  • The benefits of passive job searching
  • International arbitration: where to look for growth
  • A Q&A on Spanish law

In this issue

  • Changing the legal aid game
  • Is work-life balance achievable in the law?

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited