Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Division of sale: absolute remedy?

Division of sale: absolute remedy?

2nd March 2015 | family-child law

 Is the right to seek division and sale an absolute remedy which could be resorted to even if it flies in the face of the terms of a contractual Minute of Agreement?

Not so, according to the judgment in Fraser v Fraser.

The parties had entered into a Minute of Agreement, but there had been difficulties in implementation. The remedy sought was division and sale.

The Pursuer relied on Grant v The Governors of George Heriot's Trust as authority that division and sale was a common law right.

But the Sheriff ruled that what was meant in the Grant case when the Lord President said 'The Law of Scotland has always held that the state of joint property may be brought to an end at the instance of any one of the proprietors pursuing a division' was only that no proprietor could be compelled to remain as a common owner. He was not referring to the method by which the bonds of common ownership could be broken

The Minute of Agreement therefore did not exclude the right to have the bonds of common ownership severed, but provided the method by which it will be achieved. The jurisdiction of the court had been ousted for as long as the contract remains in force.

For more information visit: http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited