Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Letter: claims – sting in the tail

Letter: claims – sting in the tail

10th February 2016 | professional regulation

I write to draw your attention to recent difficulties I have had with our insurers, both to ascertain whether other people have had similar problems and also to seek advice in general regarding what I think is a serious issue.

My practice unit, as I believe they are now called, is a two partner firm which has been on the go since the year 2000. In that period two claims have been intimated against the firm. The first did not proceed at all but the second, intimated in 2013, went the whole hog in the sense that there was an action raised by the complainer and proof took place. The outcome was that the complainer lost the case and expenses were awarded against him.

I thought, perhaps naively, that I need not concern myself further. However when I came to renew the firm's insurance policy with RSA my premium was more than double. The reasons for this advanced by the insurers are long and convoluted. I cannot imagine this is the correct outcome and I wondered if other members have had similar problems and how they were resolved.

I am still arguing with the insurers but obviously to renew practising certificates we have had to pay the new premiums.

Branislav Sudjic, Black & Guild, Kirkcaldy

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited