Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Letter: Predictive/anticipatory conveyancing

Letter: Predictive/anticipatory conveyancing

16th February 2012 | property (non-commercial)

I feel that it is quite important to introduce members to a requirement by the Keeper/Registers of Scotland where, in connection with registration of titles in the Land Register, in particular, the sensible conveyancer should give careful consideration to predictive conveyancing.

By this I mean that the conveyancer must anticipate with considerable accuracy exactly what the client involved in that conveyancing transaction, is likely to do over the next year or so. I can only cite two current cases where, as a result of my inability to predict action taken by the client a year after the two conveyancing transactions, I now face a fee issued by the Keeper for cancellation of applications. Of the amount of the fee, more later.

The circumstances are that I act for a client who has some 40 acres remaining of an estate in Perthshire, having sold off the greater part of 9,000 acres. The residual land is mostly low ground and from time to time he will sell an area of it either as a house plot or as an extension to ground already owned by another proprietor. In 2010 two of the sales occurred and, since the residue of the estate was subject to a bank security, deeds of restriction were granted in each case and were delivered to the purchasers’ agents together with Forms 2 and 4 to allow registration. The two transactions represented transfers for value and were therefore first registrations in the Land Register.

A year later, in 2011 the client decided to discharge the bank security and the appropriate discharge was submitted with an SAF form since the title was and remained in the Register of Sasines. The discharge was recorded promptly and received back duly recorded.

We have now, in 2012, received a letter from the Keeper in each case, returning the deed of restriction pointing out that the standard security to which it related has now been fully discharged and that the deed is no longer required. It should be noted that the Keeper appears only now to be dealing with the two applications submitted in 2010.

I have no grouse with the return of the deeds of restriction. However the letter proceeds to state that a cancellation fee of £60 is charged in terms of the current order regulating fees in the Registers of Scotland. It then goes on to state that not only will the Keeper retain the £30 submitted as a registration fee in each case but that a further fee paper of £30 for the balance will be issued in due course.

I therefore recommend that the alert conveyancer must be astute enough to anticipate precisely what his client may do in the future, in the knowledge that not only is an earlier application for registration of a deed likely to be cancelled but that it will cost the conveyancer a further and additional cancellation charge if he does not apply what I will happily call in the future, “predictive conveyancing” or “anticipatory conveyancing”

Colin Mackay, Gillespie Macandrew LLP, Edinburgh
Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited