Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Loss of society award: no “tariff” applies

Loss of society award: no “tariff” applies

5th December 2017 | reparation

Decisions in which the court considers the level of damages in fatal cases are relatively rare, so the decision in Manson v Henry Robb Ltd 2017 SLT 1173 is of interest. Lord Clark considered claims for damages under s 4(3)(b) of the Damages (Scotland) Act 2011 (along with claims for loss of services), made by the adult sons (aged 59 and 55 at proof) and widow (aged 79) of a former employee of the defenders, who died aged 81 around 10 months after being diagnosed with mesothelioma.

Lord Clark commented that each claim must be determined on the particular and peculiar facts of the case and there was no room for a “tariff system”. There were two sets of significant factors here, the first being the extremely close and longstanding family relationship and how that operated in practice. The second set comprised the deceased’s already advanced age; his short life expectancy; and the age of the pursuers.

Lord Clark stated that there ought to be “some significant differentiation in quantification” where the deceased’s life expectancy had been limited and the pursuers were older and therefore would have had a limited time left with the deceased in any event (para 29). While he also took into account the pursuers’ distress in seeing the deceased’s condition deteriorate, he noted that this had lasted for a relatively short period of time. He awarded £75,000 to the deceased’s widow, with two thirds allocated to the past, and £30,000 each to his two sons, with one half allocated to the past.

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited