Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Minister's marital status could protect against church action

Minister's marital status could protect against church action

12th December 2017 | employment

In Gould v Trustees of St John’s Downshire Hill [2017] UKEAT 0115_17_0510 (5 October 2017) the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that a former evangelical Christian minister’s summary dismissal from his role with a London church was potentially unlawful on grounds of his marital status.

Rev Jonathan Gould, who had worked as a minister at St John’s Downshire Hill (STDH), London, for almost 21 years until his summary dismissal in August 2016, claimed that his sacking was unlawful on grounds that it was provoked by difficulties in his marriage, and constituted unlawful direct and indirect discrimination.

An employment judge had struck out his claim, saying it had no reasonable prospects of success. Gould appealed, maintaining that his marital difficulties were the reason for his dismissal, and that only a married individual could experience marital difficulties.

The respondents argued that the real reason for the dismissal was a breakdown of trust and confidence between the church trustees and Gould. Before the EAT they argued that allowing the appeal would open the door to bigamy and adultery. The EAT President, Mrs Justice Simler, observed that bigamy was a crime, and made short shrift of adultery.

She held that Gould’s marital status was a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010, and that the employment judge had erred in striking his claim out.

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited