Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. SLCC: one complaint fewer

SLCC: one complaint fewer

19th September 2011 | professional regulation

Further to my previous letter, I think it only fair to announce that the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission has now issued a recommendation that the complaint against my firm is not to be upheld. Accordingly my cynicism contained within my last letter was perhaps misplaced and possibly I should have had more faith in the system of dealing with such complaints. Having said that, the complainer can still take matters further by refusing to accept the recommendation.

The reason for this follow-up letter is to try to be fair to the SLCC, who are obviously in a difficult position. Having said that, the thrust of my last letter was more to do with the sifting process and it still remains my position that this complaint should have been sifted out and that a stricter regime is in place. It is a matter of great concern to all responsible, diligent and competent solicitors that they may be liable to face swingeing penalties via the SLCC at the instance of malicious and unreasonable clients. Certainly, in my own case, although I was always of the view that the complaint was a spurious one, I was concerned at the uncertainty of what might happen.

Robert Vaughan,
R S Vaughan & Co, Glasgow
 
Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited