Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Two sides to ABS

Two sides to ABS

19th May 2010 | professional regulation

"ABS" has come to signify two entirely different structures.

On the one hand, there is the true multi-disciplinary partnership, limited to lawyers and other "relevant professional advisers" (defined in the Proceeds of Crime Act at s 330(14)) and, possibly, extending to further "regulated professions" (or possibly not – see Financial Action Task Force "40 Recommendations", at the Glossary: “Designated non-financial businesses and professions" (para (e) (cited by A-G Kokott in her AKZO opinion)).

On the other hand, there is a structure whose composition is not so limited.

The former presents no insoluble problems. The latter is unknown in the rest of Europe and is likely to remain so, whatever might issue from the Legal Services Act (England & Wales) or a future Legal Services (Scotland) Act.

The doubts and concerns about the non-MDP ABS will remain so long as the United Kingdom remains a member of the Financial Action Task Force, and so long as there are laws about data protection and unfair terms in consumer contracts.

It would be a pity if, just before the flaws in the non-MDP ABS concept start to become better understood by consumer and privacy groups, the Law Society of Scotland were to be diminished by the loss of its 60-year-old dual role.

James McLean is a partner in Burness LLP
 
Like to comment on this article? Please use the box below. Comments will be checked and then put live.
Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited