Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Unfair prejudice petitions in the sheriff court

Unfair prejudice petitions in the sheriff court

19th May 2016 | civil litigation , corporate

Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 allows for actions to be taken by a shareholder where unfairly prejudicial conduct of the company’s affairs is alleged. Section 996 provides for the remedies which may be obtained from the court. Although the Act refers to a petition being presented, such actions can be brought in the sheriff court by way of summary application such as occurred in Wishart, Petitioner [2016] SC FOR 29.

In this action the “innovative and creative” remedy sought was a payment by a wife against her divorced spouse and fellow shareholder in a company formerly operated by them both during their marriage.

The procedural points to note were: (1) it was competent to amend the application before the court, as the summary procedure is a highly flexible one; (2) s 996 in principle permits an order for the payment of money; (3) s 15A of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987 permits interim diligence as part of such an application, so long as there is a crave for the payment of money; (4) whilst an unauthorised loan to the director husband did not constitute unfair prejudice, a prima facie case was made out in relation to large sums of money allegedly paid out to the husband where no corresponding dividend had been paid to the wife. In those circumstances, it was arguable, just, that the corporate veil could be lifted and for decree for the unpaid share to be made against the husband personally.

The full decision can be read here.

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited