Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Law Society news
  4. Investigatory Powers Bill could breach client confidentiality and break EU law

Investigatory Powers Bill could breach client confidentiality and break EU law

11th April 2016 | Law Society news

The Law Society of Scotland has warned that despite moves to protect client communications with solicitors, the UK Government’s Investigatory Powers Bill could still fall short.

Tim Musson, convener of the Law Society of Scotland privacy law committee, said: “Protecting the privacy of a client’s communications with their lawyer is essential. We are pleased that the UK Government accepted the arguments to ensure that protections for client confidentiality would be in the face of the proposed legislation, rather than through a code of conduct, but there are still risks that confidentiality could be breached.

“We know  that the government does not have an easy task in striking the right balance between protecting people from the threats of today’s digitalised world while still enabling them to exercise the freedoms that modern technology can offer. But the means of protection should not nullify the very freedoms we are trying to protect.

“The changing nature of communications means we need to beware of intrusions of our privacy. Not only the content  of a communication, but also communications data itself can reveal a lot of information about a client, their lawyer and the advice that has been given.

“Collecting lots of data relating to significant numbers of people in a wholly indiscriminate way will inevitably result in the capture of information relating to client/lawyer communications. Confidential information between a lawyer and a client contributes to the rule of law, the proper functioning of the courts and is in the interests of justice. This information requires protection as it’s essential to ensure a client can speak freely with his or her lawyer and that the advice they receive will not be disclosed to the police, the security service or the media.”

The Society has also pointed out potential risks relating to the requirement for telecommunications operators to retain data.

Musson said: “There have been a number of high profile data breaches in the past year, such as Talk Talk, Carphone Warehouse, Hilton hotels, and we are not convinced that telecommunications operators will be able to store this information securely. There is the risk that cybercriminals will see such data banks as prime targets, with the information held potentially being used to target particular groups, including vulnerable people.

“Large scale data collection of this type could also be in contravention of EU law and we believe that the UK Government needs to be clear on how they believe the draft legislation will be compliant.”

The full Law Society of Scotland response can be read on the website: https://www.lawscot.org.uk/for-the-public/law-reform-consultations-and-bills/bills-201516/investigatory-powers-bill/

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited