Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Human rights actions risk US-UK military relations, General warns

Human rights actions risk US-UK military relations, General warns

19th October 2018 | human rights , reparation

The "fog of law" – the growing risk of legal action against members of the armed forces following combat operations – could be undermining the operational effectiveness of British troops, and putting at risk the special relationship between the US and UK military, according to a former US military commander. 

General David Petraeus made the claim on a visit to the centre-right think tank Policy Exchange, and in an article in the Times today. He identified the problem as "increasing friction" between the legal framework of, on the one hand, the Geneva Convention, under which lethal force is allowed as a matter of first resort against a clearly identified enemy, and on the other the European Convention on Human Rights, which permits it, he states, only as a last resort and in exceptional circumstances.

The latter had given rise, he added, to "judicial pursuit of British soldiers and veterans", which was "reported to be having a chilling effect on recruitung and retention of British armed forces and on their overall morale".

Pointing to the "relentless and seemingly unending pursuit of veterans from the 1970s in Northern Ireland", as well as actions arising from operations in Afghanistan, he claimed that the UK's fighting capacity "will be greatly diminished if it cannot reform the legal framework within which it fights, and restore the primacy of the law of armed conflict".

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited