Lawyer calls for review of "anti-business" immigration rules
An immigration lawyer has called for an urgent review of the UK’s business immigration rules, in the wake of a further breach of the cap on the number of foreign workers coming to the UK.
Jamie Kerr, a partner at Thorntons in Edinburgh, was speaking after it emerged that the UK Government’s cap has been breached for the fourth month in a row.
The Home Office maintains a UK-wide cap on the number of people who can be sponsored for visas by their employer. The limit is 20,700 per year and is divided into monthly allocations. If the cap is breached in any given month, the Home Office uses a points-scoring mechanism based on salaries, with those paying higher wages scoring more points.
The immigration cap was hit for the first time in two years in December 2017, meaning that all potential employees who had been offered salaries of less than £55,000 were denied entry – even if they met all the usual eligibility criteria for a visa. The cap was breached again in January and again this month, with the required salary level increasing to £60,000.
Mr Kerr commented: "The Home Office’s insistence on keeping its restrictive immigration cap is madness. It is damaging to so many successful businesses across the country and it’s quite frankly anti-business.
"Given the current challenges around Brexit, it is important that the Government supports businesses to innovate, grow and create jobs. But its obsession on capping employer visas at a wholly arbitrary number means that business are being starved of the international talent they need to grow.
"The demand that companies pay salaries for overseas workers that are more than double the UK’s average wage is, for most businesses, simply unaffordable."
He claimed the cap was "creating chaos for companies": "They cannot effectively plan recruitment or expansion as they don’t know if the cap next month will be breached again or what the threshold will be. Scotland and the English regions are being hit hardest by these rules and the cap needs to be scrapped or urgently re-thought because it is now damaging the country’s economic interests."