Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Revised "named persons" bill still needs improvement, Faculty believes

Revised "named persons" bill still needs improvement, Faculty believes

17th August 2017 | family-child law , human rights

Ministers' attempts to cure the flaws in the “named person” legislation still require modification to meet the criticisms made by the UK Supreme Court, according to the Faculty of Advocates.

Faculty has published its submission on the Children and Young People (Information Sharing) (Scotland) Bill, drafted in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. The bill is being considfered at stage 1 by the Scottish Parliament’s Education & Skills Committee, which called for views on the measure.

In its evidence Faculty points out that two principal issues were identified by the Supreme Court – a serious lack of clarity for those implementing the legislation and the lack of safeguards for those affected.

“Neither of these issues is easy to resolve, and some of the criticisms of the Supreme Court will continue to apply if the bill as drafted is passed and the accompanying code of practice is approved”, it comments.

Faculty disapproves of the fact that issues relating to informing a child or young person, or parent, that information is to be shared and obtaining consent, are discussed in the code of practice, but not mentioned in the bill.

“In our view, these issues are sufficiently fundamental to be referred to within the legislation itself, rather than simply being dealt with in the code of practice,” it submits.

"It should be remembered that a code of practice is not a substitute for legislation. A code is not debated and passed by the Parliament. Where there is any conflict between the statute and the code of practice, the statute will prevail."

Faculty further comments that the information sharing provisions, which will require to be operated by teachers, health visitors, social workers and other non-lawyers, need to be clear and accessible.

“The draft code itself illustrates the complexity of the issues to be faced, and dealt with by busy professionals focused on other aspects of provision for children. A professional considering information sharing is required to carry out a proportionality exercise…

“We remain concerned that this is an exceptionally difficult requirement to impose on professionals in respect of every child in Scotland. Its imposition risks making their job considerably more difficult and undermining the trust of families and the willingness to share information with the professional concerned.

“In our view, the code of practice itself would benefit from being phrased in more accessible language… Given the complex exercise being expected of those professionals, they should also, in our view, have access to an advice service or helpline to provide assistance when they are uncertain how to deal with information sharing.”

Click here to view the full response. 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited