Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. RSPB refused permission to appeal North Sea wind farms decision

RSPB refused permission to appeal North Sea wind farms decision

7th November 2017 | planning/environment

Construction of four offshore wind farms in the North Sea is set to go ahead after the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds failed in a final attempt to challenge the permission for the developments.

A panel of three Justices of the UK Supreme Court refused an application by the RSPB for permission to appeal a decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session, reversing the Lord Ordinary and holding that the Scottish ministers had followed proper procedures and given adequate reasons for their decision to approve the proposed developments of Inch Cape, Seagreen Alpha, Seagreen Bravo and Neart na Gaoith in the Firth of Forth and Firth of Tay (click here for report).

The RSPB objected to the developments on the basis that they could have an adverse impact to several species of seabirds which had protected habitats in the Firth of Forth and on the Angus coast.

In a statement the Supreme Court said: "Permission to appeal has been refused on the grounds that the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered at this time, bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal."

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited