Proposed rule change
The Society is proposing to change the wording of rule D2.3 of the Consolidated Practice Rules
The Society is proposing to change the wording of rule D2.3 of the Consolidated Practice Rules.
The proposed new wording, with the additional words shown in italics, is: “You shall not cause or permit the name of any person to appear on the nameplate, website, professional stationery or any advertising or promotional material of the practice unit of which you are a manager unless that person is:
- a) A manager of that practice unit,
- b) A consultant to that practice unit,
- c) An associate of that practice unit, or
- d) An employee of that practice unit.”
Share this article
In this issue
- Off on the wrong track
- Cadder, EU style
- Common grazing shares – where are we now?
- Is it time to stop baffling our clients/customers?
- Copyright and collaboration: a dose of bad medicine?
- Reading for pleasure
- Opinion column: Ken McCracken
- Book reviews
- Council profile
- President's column
- New build: new process
- Up or down? Digging deeper
- Who volunteers to be discriminated against?
- What's your LPO strategy for 2013?
- Tailored to suit
- Perfect storm less than appealing
- Separate but legal
- In and out of court
- Coming to a court near you
- Which way will the wind blow?
- Entitled to be aggrieved
- Funds less restricted
- Statement or Budget?
- Local leg-up
- Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
- Answering for error
- The other alternative
- Remoteness and risk
- Paralegal Scheme extended
- Proposed rule change
- Law reform roundup
- An innocent loan or questionable funds?
- Ask Ash