Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Faculty lends support to procurement tribunal plan

Faculty lends support to procurement tribunal plan

15th May 2015 | government-administration

A proposal for a new tribunal in Scotland to deal with complaints about the awarding of public contracts has been given the support of the Faculty of Advocates.

The idea was put forward by the Scottish Government In a consultation paper on changes to the public procurement rules in Scotland. It suggested that a review body at a level below the courts to hear cases regarding alleged infringement of the rules would be likely to provide the most effective form of review.

In its response, the Faculty comments: “Although we are not persuaded that procedure before such a body would necessarily be cheaper or faster than immediate recourse to the courts, we consider that the principal advantages would be the accrual, within the review body, of a degree of specialist expertise and the likelihood of a fair degree of consistency in the review body’s judgments.”

It adds that dedicated review bodies in countries such as Germany and Austria had developed considerable specialist expertise.

On the question of whether the review body should be established as a tribunal or take some other form, for example, as a Scottish Procurement Ombudsman, the Faculty sides with a tribunal within the existing Scottish tribunals system.

“Such a tribunal would be able to operate by reference to general rules of procedure applicable to the Scottish tribunals as a whole and its judgments would fit readily into a clearly discernible system of appeals”, Faculty states.

“An ombudsman is unlikely to be as well equipped as a tribunal to deal with the legal complexities raised by public procurement litigation.”

Click here to view the submission. 

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited