Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Sheridan fails with SCCRC judicial review attempt

Sheridan fails with SCCRC judicial review attempt

11th April 2019 | criminal law

Tommy Sheridan has failed before the Inner House of the Court of Session in his attempt to bring a judicial review of a refusal to investigate an alleged miscarriage of justice relating to his conviction for perjury.

The former Scottish Socialist Party leader had applied to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission to look into his 2010 conviction on a charge of lying on oath in his defamation case against the News of the World. He failed in the Outer House, where the Lord Ordinary held that the SCCRC was entitled to conclude that he had not produced material which challenged the soundness of the verdict in his trial, and had failed to demonstrate that they were not entitled to come to the conclusions they did. While he made allegations against counsel acting for his co-accused, he had been unable to say how these had prejudiced him.

Delivering the opinion of the Inner House, Lord President Carloway, who sat with Lord Menzies and Lord Drummond Young, said Mr Sheridan had failed to appreciate "the limitations under which the court operates" when asked to review the decision of a specialist body such as the SCCRC. There was no statutory appeal process and review could only be on "conventional grounds of illegality". 

His allegation of error of law was little more than "a contention that, having regard to a string of documents in connection with [News Group's] illegal or improper activites, the respondents' decisions were wrong", in circumstances "where no such error is visible".

The "fundamental flaw" in the applicaiton for judicial review was the idea that the existence of a conspiracy by News Group, or members of his party, to "get" or "target" Mr Sheridan amounted to a defence to the charge iof perjury. While this miught serve to undermine the credibility or reliability of witnesses, "It does not follow that... the jury would be bound, or even likely, to acquit."

The SCCRC was not bound to conduct a general inquiry into the circumstances of the conviction, and Mr Sheridan "cannot view the respondents as his own personal private investigators". While he had "bombarded" it with a mass of material, the existence of an alleged conspiracy against him was an issue that "had already been well alight at the trial". The SCCRC had not been asked to use their powers to obtain further material; it was entitled to consider whether the information was material to the issue of miscarriage of justice; and most important, it had reasoned that demonstrating the conspiracy "would not have affected the jury's verdict given the strength of the Crown case".

Click here to view the opinion of the court.

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited