Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Government paper warns of post-Brexit cross-border crime challenges

Government paper warns of post-Brexit cross-border crime challenges

14th June 2018 | criminal law , government-administration

Cross-border crime will present “complex and far-reaching” challenges to Scotland’s police and prosecutors after Brexit, a new Scottish Government paper claims.

Scotland’s Place in Europe: Security, Judicial Co-operation and Law Enforcement, part of a series covering "Scotland’s Place in Europe", details the impact of withdrawing from the EU’s cross-border security, law enforcement and criminal justice co-operation measures without putting effective substitute arrangements in place.

To date, it alleges, discussions in the Joint Ministerial Committee on EU Negotiations, established to provide a means for the devolved administrations to be fully engaged in the UK Government’s approach to Brexit, have "fallen short of the ambition set out in its terms of reference, and of the Prime Minister’s own commitment to 'full involvement' of the devolved administrations and have singularly failed to meet the forum’s terms of reference".

The paper sets out the Scottish Government’s view on the importance of protecting access to measures such as Europol, the European arrest warrant, the computerised systemn for sharing informariton on criminal records, and the Schengen information system II (which facilitates real-time alerts on wanted or missing persons as well as stolen or missing property) as part of the UK and EU negotiations – and of Scotland's law enforcement agencies maintaining direct links with their EU counterparts.

Further EU measures include participation in Eurojust, which facilitates judicial co-operation between member states, for example through joint investigation teams to conduct joint searches and gather evidence in accordance with each country’s rules; and the European protection order, which grants victims the same protection from their aggressor across member states.

Lord Advocate James Wolffe QC stressed the importance, in the negotiations between the UK and the EU, of agreeing "effective arrangements... which maintain our collective capability for tackling crime and keeping our citizens safe".

Justice Secretary Michael Matheson commented: "From cybercrime, to human trafficking and terrorism, international crime has never respected borders. Over the years Scotland’s police and prosecution services have built strong links with their EU counterparts to help keep people safe.

"Withdrawal from the current regime of co-operation, including for example the European arrest warrant system, could mean returning to a more fragmented system of seeking assistance across borders. We risk being left behind as our European counterparts develop more effective tools to deal with present and future threats.

"Though we would prefer not to be leaving the EU, the Scottish Government stands ready to play a constructive role in exploring solutions. Our independent justice system means Scotland’s voice must be heard and we continue to push the UK Government for real and meaningful input into the negotiations with the EU."

Click here to access the paper.

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited