Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Care Service Bill powers "unacceptable", MSPs claim

Care Service Bill powers "unacceptable", MSPs claim

6th February 2023 | government-administration | Health

An "unacceptable" level of powers is set to be delegated to ministers in the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill, a Holyrood committee has reported.

In its stage 1 report on the bill, a majority on the Scottish Parliament's Delegated Powers & Law Reform Committee conclude that the measure "risks setting a dangerous precedent, undermining the role of the Parliament".

Their concern centres on the bill's use of delegated powers instead of primary legislation to introduce "core and as yet unknown provisions" about how the proposed new National Care Service will operate. This, they state, "significantly reduces the threshold for parliamentary approval and prevents MSPs from bringing forward detailed amendments".

The Scottish Government is taking a new approach to this legislation, which it is terming "co-design". It intends the bill to creates a framework for the National Care Service, but leaving space for the detail to be worked through during co-design with those who have lived experience of the social care system, and flexibility for the service to develop and evolve over time.

The minister giving evidence to the committee claimed that although others had argued that the co-design could have preceded the legislation, "that would have impinged on the folk who would have been involved in the co-design. The co-design work might have gone to waste, in people’s eyes, if Parliament then changed far too much of what the folks who helped us with the design wanted in place".

However the committee concluded that it was "unable meaningfully to report on the provisions and delegated powers of the bill as it stands", and "strongly refutes the suggestion that full parliamentary scrutiny presents a barrier to collaborative working". It "does not believe the bill should progress in its current form".

The two SNP members on the committee dissented, stating: "We note that the concept of co-design is a new approach and the reasons that the Scottish Government has set out to justify its use in this instance. We are content with the general approach taken in respect of this bill and are therefore content with the delegation of the powers in principle."

The lead committee on the bill, the Health & Social Care Committee, has still to produce its report.

Read the Delegated Powers Committee's report.

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Jury trials to return to the islands in spring
  • SCTS revises criminal case backlog predictions
  • Current justice funding model unsustainable: MSP report
  • Crime figures up 3% in first full post-Covid year
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited