Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. COVID recovery plan must rebalance human rights: MSPs

COVID recovery plan must rebalance human rights: MSPs

2nd March 2021 | human rights , government-administration | Human rights

Scotland's recovery plan from the COVID-19 pandemic must ensure that those people who have already experienced disproportionately negative effects as a result of the crisis do not suffer further, a Holyrood committee states in a report published today.

Concluding its inquiry into the impact of COVID-19 on human rights, the Equalities & Human Rights Committee calls for the rights of women, older people, children and black and minority ethnic communities to be at the forefront of policy makers' minds as Scotland exits the pandemic.

The MSPs say they heard evidence which suggested, at its worst, a "wholesale disregard" for equalities and human rights legislation in the response to the public health emergency.

Measures taken to address the pandemic had "multiplied" the effect on women, who were more likely to take on the burden of unpaid care and make up a higher proportion of those employed in low paid and furloughed sectors, or as frontline health and social care workers.

Lockdown restrictions, homeworking, closure of schools, early release of prisoners, reductions in the work of courts and closure of some services, had particularly impacted on women and children in domestic abuse situations.

The report recommends that the Scottish Government carries out a detailed cumulative impact assessment of the steps taken to mitigate the pandemic, and in relation to its recovery planning, to ensure women are not further impacted disproportionately.

Concerns about the rights of older people ranged from access to food and essential public services to social isolation, which were compounded by digital exclusion and reductions in public transport availability.

The welfare of care home residents was also a key issue for the committee, with concerns relating to deaths of residents, equality of access to hospital treatment, whether clinical guidance was appropriate, availability of personal protective equipment, the adequacy of coronavirus testing and the facilitating of visits.

MSPs welcomed the intention to hold a public inquiry into care homes, but ask the Government to ensure its inquiry gives specific consideration to whether human rights standards and principles have been met.

The committee received a wide range of views about the effect of the pandemic on children and younger people, with a particular focus on access to education, including children with additional support needs, social isolation, access to mental health services, employment, children and young people in vulnerable situations, and living in poverty.

Other evidence showed that black and minority communities have faced particular vulnerabilities in relation to the health and economic impacts of COVID-19. 

Committee convener Ruth Maguire MSP commented: "During this past year, we've all faced the challenges of a pandemic and the measures put in place to deal with it. However, it is crystal clear that the reality is those already facing inequality, for example due to their sex, age, disability and race or in those vulnerable situations due to poverty, have been impacted to the greatest extent.

"While the committee recognises that emergency measures needed to be taken to stop the spread of COVID-19, public bodies' decisions must at all times be compliant with equalities and human rights legislation and standards. The evidence to our inquiry suggested that, at best, there is a mixed picture of compliance, and at worst, wholesale disregard.

"It is absolutely crucial that as service providers, law and policy makers we understand completely the impact of our decisions on the people we serve. We must become more rigorous with our data gathering, ensure lived experience is captured in a meaningful way, and prioritise use of impact assessments to take fully informed decisions that not only mitigate harm, but advance human rights and equalities and improve the lives of our citizens."

Click here to access the committee's report.

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Consultation explores support for learning disabilities
  • Ministers will not appeal s 35 ruling, nor withdraw bill
  • Restricted UNCRC Bill approved by Holyrood
  • IBA revises Business and Human Rights guidance
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited