Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Ministers propose to restrict scope of UNCRC Bill

Ministers propose to restrict scope of UNCRC Bill

28th June 2023 | family-child law , human rights | Children , Human rights

The bill to incorporate the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child into Scots law is to be scaled back following the UK Supreme Court ruling that parts of it go beyond Holyrood's powers, the Scottish Government has confirmed.

Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville told the Parliament that amendments to be brought forward after the summer recess will mean that public authorities will only be required to comply with the UNCRC requirements when delivering duties under powers in an Act of the Scottish Parliament.

As passed by the Parliament in 2021, the bill requires all Scotland’s public authorities to take proactive steps to protect children’s rights, and makes these rights enforceable in court by children, young people and their representatives. The Supreme Court ruled that provisions requiring certain Westminster legislation to be given effect so far as possible in a manner compatible with the UNCRC, and allowing the courts to strike down or declare such legislation as incompatible with the Convention, contravened the Scotland Act, as did the section requiring any public authority, carrying out any function, to act in an incompatible way.

Ms Somerville said: "In consultation with stakeholders, including the Children’s Commissioner Office, Together, The Scottish Human Rights Commission, Unicef UK and members of the Scottish Youth Parliament, ministers have reached the conclusion that the most effective route forward is to progress the option that minimises the risk of a further referral to the Supreme Court, and which also minimises the complexity users will need to navigate.

"Ministers will now seek to confirm with the parliamentary authorities that amendments are admissible under Standing Orders for Reconsideration and then lodge a motion so that Parliament can confirm its willingness to reconsider the bill."

She explained that although the Government had looked at ways of enabling the bill to apply to UK legislation devolved areas, "UK Government lawyers have continued to raise questions and it has become clear to me that they cannot give us reassurance – no matter what is put to them – that would guarantee there will not be another referral to the Supreme Court".

However ministers will continue to call for the UK Government to adopt the Convention into UK law.

Opposition members accused the Government of wasting time since the Supreme Court ruling in October 2021, and of stoking grievance against Westminster.

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Consultation explores support for learning disabilities
  • Ministers will not appeal s 35 ruling, nor withdraw bill
  • Restricted UNCRC Bill approved by Holyrood
  • IBA revises Business and Human Rights guidance
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited