Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Report backs Abuse Redress Bill despite waiver flaws

Report backs Abuse Redress Bill despite waiver flaws

9th December 2020 | reparation

A Holyrood committee has backed the general principles of the Redress for Survivors (Historical Child Abuse in Care) (Scotland) Bill, despite having "fundamental issues" with certain provisions.

In its stage 1 report on the bill, the Education & Skills Committee concludes that while there are "some fundamental issues with the bill's waiver provisions and the way in which 'fair and meaningful' contributions to the scheme are calculated", the bill provides a straightforward, easy to access scheme that will play a vital role in helping victims/survivors obtain redress.

The bill would provide fixed rate compensation at levels from £10,000 to £80,000, but claimants would have to waive the ability to bring court proceedings in addition, a feature which has been strongly criticised.

Committee members recognise that the scheme will not provide the solution all victims/survivors are seeking, and that some survivors will be unable to benefit from the scheme, due to the way in which they found themselves in care.

Under the bill as it stands, children must have been placed in care by the state, and not voluntarily by their parents, though the report notes that some children in the latter category suffered equal abuse. It recommends that there should be scope for the proposed Redress Scotland body to consider such cases "on an exceptional basis".

It further notes a "general dissatisfaction amongst victims/survivors" at the proposed levels of compensation, and recommends that the Scottish Government revisits these ahead of stage 2.

On waiver, the MSPs report: "Whilst the Scottish Government's stated intention is to create a redress system which would offer more choice to victims/survivors, the overwhelming view conveyed to the committee by victims/survivors was that the waiver restricted their choices and therefore they felt it should be removed...

"The overwhelming evidence received by the committee from both victims/ survivors and potential contributors suggests that the case for a waiver has not been adequately made. The committee recommends that the Scottish Government considers removing the waiver and find another way to avoid making double payments to victims/survivors."

They further recommend that in order to allow victims/survivors sufficient time to access the redress scheme, the Government should consider extending the scheme beyond its initial five year duration.

Click here to view the report. 

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Professional practice test applied to treatment advice
  • PI discount rate factors: views sought ahead of review
  • Friends sharing house could found unjust enrichment case
  • Childhood abuse case pursuers win “fair hearing” appeal
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited