Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Shared Parenting Scotland expresses concern over pressure on courts

Shared Parenting Scotland expresses concern over pressure on courts

21st July 2020

Shared Parenting Scotland has written to the Lord President, Lord Carloway to give early intelligence on the pressure building up on the courts.

This comes after the organisation recorded a 50% increase in enquiries in June compared to the same month in 2019. 

An increasing number of those who get in touch are concerned about the consequent effect of Covid-19 on their case. They say it is not only proceedings but relationships that are being affected with months passing since a child last spent time with one of her/his parents.

In his letter to Lord Carloway, Shared Parenting Scotland’s national manager, Ian Maxwell, identified three particular issues: 

  • supervised contact, with contact centres largely remaining unable to facilitate supervised contact of the sort that may have been ordered by a court as far back as November or December 2019 
  • the build-up of completely new Section 11 contact/residence cases, which will add to the task of hearing the backlog of existing family cases 
  • telephone hearings used to make initial considerations include only involved agents, but having parents present during a hearing is important, even if this through a virtual presence.

Ian Maxwell said: “Of course the judiciary doesn’t have control over contact centres, but we anticipate that the low availability of supervised or even supported contact for the purposes of a report to the sheriff or to facilitate observation by a child welfare reporter is hindering the work of the courts.  It is also leaving parents and children in a relationship limbo that has already lasted months and will continue much longer.

“With respect to a build up of new cases, many of our June enquiries were from separated parents who had informal arrangements before the start of the Coronavirus lockdown. Some of these agreements have broken down because of the stresses during this period.   We anticipate that this will lead to a surge of new court cases.

“We have proposed to the Lord President that the Sheriff Courts and Court of Session could seek to explore new ways of assessing all Section 11 cases quickly, making use of some of the experience gained during this extraordinary period.  

“Our impression at this stage is that the telephone hearings have been working well for those parties who have successfully presented an ‘urgent business’ case.  Of course, others are disappointed at not being considered sufficiently urgent. There appears to be a level of inconsistency between courts but the feedback on those that have taken place is largely positive.

“We suggest that it would be desirable to continue the practice of requiring short submissions for an initial consideration of the case as early as possible, so that an interim decision can be made on whether it is in the child’s best interest to resume contact.”

 

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited