Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. UK internal market must respect devolution: MSPs

UK internal market must respect devolution: MSPs

18th August 2020 | government-administration , corporate | Competition

The post-Brexit UK internal market needs mutual trust and respect between governments, Holyrood’s Finance & Constitution Committee has stated.

In an initial response to the UK Government’s consultation on the UK Internal Market white paper, the committee maintains that an internal market must, as a minimum, be based on inclusive dialogue with the devolved governments, Parliaments and wider public.

The letter, to Business Secretary Alok Sharma, describes it as "deeply regrettable" that the proposals were published during the Scottish Parliament’s recess period and that the consultation lasted only four weeks. Like its counterpart in the Welsh Parliament, it considers this timeframe "wholly inadequate"; and that as the proposals contain "little detail as to how the mechanisms for managing an internal market will work in practice, there is little scope for meaningful engagement by the devolved legislatures and stakeholders before the introduction of a UK Bill".

While the committee recognises the economic benefits to businesses across the four nations of the UK of rules that ensure there are no barriers to trading within the UK, it observes that EU experience has taught that there is more than one way to design an internal market.

Trade-offs and balances are involved in making an internal market, and the operation of an internal market "depends upon its governance architecture and its relationship with constitutional settlements... the legal design of an internal market involves choices, balances and trade-offs that demand detailed consideration, and must not be imposed".

The committee asks for further clarification of the Government's intentions and promises that it will carry out further work once the bill is published. It seeks full consultation on a draft bill before the legislation is introduced.

Committee convener Bruce Crawford MSP commented: "The committee’s view is that there is an onus on all four governments and legislatures across the UK to work constructively together to seek a solution to this complex and challenging issue. 

"This must be achieved through mutual trust and respect for the existing constitutional arrangements within the UK. 

"In particular – as this Committee has emphasised on numerous occasions – the UK Government, post-Brexit, must respect the devolution settlement.   There must be a transparent and inclusive public debate on the white paper proposals which allows all interested parties and the wider public to contribute."

He added: "The significance of the proposals for all citizens across the UK means that the solution cannot be left to the UK Government to decide. 

"A consensus needs to be achieved and this requires a much longer, inclusive and more detailed debate than what is currently being proposed."

Conservative members of the committee did not support the terms of the letter. 

Click here to read the full response.

 

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Consultation explores support for learning disabilities
  • Ministers will not appeal s 35 ruling, nor withdraw bill
  • MSP committee majority backs Visitor Levy Bill
  • Too many Commissioners? MSPs to investigate
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited